ABSTRACT
Objective • To explore the value of the 2013 version of the ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification diagnostic criteria combined with ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) to identify benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods • A total of 175 solid breast masses in 155 women were examined with ultrasound, and were judged to be benign or malignant by BI-RADS classification criteria. Then all the masses were examined with shear wave elastography (SWE), to obtain shear wave quantitative parameters of benign and malignant breast lesions, the pathological results were used as the gold standard to construct the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the subjects, which were used to compare the diagnostic value of the two methods alone and in combination. Results • The area under curve (AUC) of the BI-RADS classification diagnostic criteria, the Emax value, and the combination of the two methods to differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast nodules were 0913, 0.884 and 0.957, respectively. Through pairwise comparison, there was significant difference in AUC between the two methods alone and their combination (BI-RADS classification vs. combination: Z=2.883, P=0.002; SWE vs. combination: Z=4.081, P=0.000). Conclusion • The combination of BI-RADS classification and SWE technology can improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast lesions.
ABSTRACT
Objective · To explore the value of the 2013 version of the ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification diagnostic criteria combined with ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) to identify benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods · A total of 175 solid breast masses in 155 women were examined with ultrasound, and were judged to be benign or malignant by BI-RADS classification criteria. Then all the masses were examined with shear wave elastography (SWE), to obtain shear wave quantitative parameters of benign and malignant breast lesions, the pathological results were used as the gold standard to construct the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the subjects, which were used to compare the diagnostic value of the two methods alone and in combination. Results · The area under curve (AUC) of the BI-RADS classification diagnostic criteria, the Emax value, and the combination of the two methods to differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast nodules were 0913, 0.884 and 0.957, respectively. Through pairwise comparison, there was significant difference in AUC between the two methods alone and their combination (BI-RADS classification vs. combination: Z=2.883, P=0.002; SWE vs. combination: Z=4.081, P=0.000). Conclusion · The combination of BI-RADS classification and SWE technology can improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast lesions.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To analyze the feature of breast complex cystic masses and to classify it at ultrasonography (US), which applied to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories 4a to 4c with pathological results as the golden standards.@*Methods@#The ultrasonographic data and clinical features of 78 patients with complex cystic masses confirmed by pathology in Cancer Hospital from July 2014 to June 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The complex cystic breast masses were divided into four classes on the basis of their US features: type 1 [thick wall and (or) thick septa (> 0.5 mm)], type 2 (one or more intra-cystic masses), type 3 (mixed cystic and solid components with cystic components more than 50%) and type 4 (mixed cystic and solid components with solid components more than 50%). Positive values (PPVs) were calculated for each type. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the ultrasonographic features of the masses (lesion size, margins, blood flow resistance index, calcification, and axillary lymph nodes, etc.) with malignant correlation.@*Results@#There were 81 lesions in 78 patients. Among the 81 masses based on US appearance, 14 (17.3%) were classified as type Ⅰ, 18 (22.2%) as type Ⅱ, 18 (22.2%) as type Ⅲ, and 31 (38.3%) as type Ⅳ. The positive predictive values of the malignant lesions of type Ⅰ, type Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 7.1%, 16.7%, 61.1% and 48.3%, respectively (P=0.040). In all the 81 masses, 14 were BI-RADS categories 4a, 18 were BI-RADS categories 4b and 49 were BI-RADS categories 4c. Masses with maximum diameter equal to or larger than 2.0 cm, unclear margins, RI≥0.7 and presence of abnormal axillary nodes assessment had a high probability of malignancy (P=0.030, 0.038, <0.001 and 0.025, respectively).@*Conclusion@#Ultrasound typing is helpful for differentiating benign and malignant breast complex cysts and classifying BI-AIDS 4a to 4c, thus providing clearer treatment for clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) and the diagnostic performance of the ultrasonographic descriptors in the fifth edition of BI-RADS, comparing with the fourth edition using video clips. METHODS: From September 2013 to July 2014, 80 breast masses in 74 women (mean age, 47.5±10.7 years) from five institutions of the Korean Society of Breast Imaging were included. Two radiologists individually reviewed the static and video images and analyzed the images according to the fourth and fifth edition of BI-RADS. The PPV of each descriptor was calculated and diagnostic performances between the fourth and fifth editions were compared. RESULTS: Of the 80 breast masses, 51 (63.8%) were benign and 29 (36.2%) were malignant. Suspicious ultrasonographic features such as irregular shape, non-parallel orientation, angular or spiculated margins, and combined posterior features showed higher PPV in both editions (all P0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was higher in the fourth edition (0.708 to 0.690), without significance (P=0.416). CONCLUSION: The fifth edition of the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon showed comparable performance to the fourth edition and can be useful in the differential diagnosis of breast masses using ultrasonography.